Skip to main content

4.2 Key Performance Indicators

4.2 Key Performance Indicators


  • Performance indicators operate in the same way as risk indicators with only difference is the risk indicator is to measure and monitor the risk whereas performance indicator is to measure and monitor the performance. Performance indicators measure how well a process is doing in terms of its goals and objectives.


  • For example, a KPI may indicate that an error rate of 10 percent is within limit however anything above 10 percent requires escalation with some form of response.


  • Following are the characteristics of a good KPI metrics:


  • KPI should have a feature of SMART i.e. smart, measurable, achievable, reliable and timeliness.

  • KPI should provide value to the business.

  • KPI should be linked to a specific business goal.

  • KPI should be measurable and comparable over a period of time.


  • With the use of key performance indicators, organizations can measure and monitor a performance change indication.


  • Key Performance Indicators and Key Risk Indicators are mostly used in combination with one another to measure performance and mitigate risk.


Key aspects from CRISC exam perspective


CRISC Questions

Possible Answer 

What is the primary objective of key performance indicators ?

To determine how well a process is doing in terms of its goals and objectives.


 

   


Self-Assessment Questions


Flashcards - 4.2 Key Performance Indicators


Practice Questions - 4.2 Key Performance Indicators




Popular posts from this blog

1.1 Risk Capacity, Risk Appetite and Risk Tolerance

1.1   Risk Capacity, Appetite and Tolerance First step of any risk management learning is to understand following three important terms: Risk Capacity Risk Tolerance  Risk Appetite  Let us understand the difference between Risk Capacity, Risk Appetite and Risk Tolerance:   Parameter Descriptions Risk Capacity Maximum risk an organization can afford to take. Risk Tolerance Risk tolerance levels are acceptable deviations from risk appetite. They are always lower than risk capacity. Risk Appetite Amount of risk an organization is willing to take.   Let us understand this with an practical example: Mr. A’s total saving is $1000. He wants to invest in equities to earn some income. Being risk conscious, he decides to invest only up to $700.  If the markets are good he is willing to further invest  $50.  Risk Capacity: Total amount available i.e. $1000 RIsk Appetite: His willingness to take risk i.e. $700 Risk Tolerance: A...
Read more

Welcome to first ever Web Book on CRISC (Certified Risk & Information System Control)

We welcome you to access this web book on CRISC (Certified Risk & Information System Control) by ISACA.   Features of this web book are as follow:  This web book is designed on the basis of official resources of ISACA.  Web book is designed specifically for candidates from non-technical background. Topics are arranged segment wise and aligned with latest CRISC Review Manual.  500 + Exam oriented practice questions.  Start your preparation here: Chapter 1   Chapter 2   Chapter 3   Chapter 4   CRISC - Recorded Lectures  We are happy to announce that CRISC lectures is now made available in Udemy in recorded form. You can access them at any time as per your convenience. You will have life time access for the recorded lectures.  Following are the salient features of the lecture: This course is designed on the basis of official resources of ISACA. Course is designed specifically for candidates from non-technical backgrou...
Read more

2.7 Risk Analysis Methodologies

2.7 Risk Analysis Methodologies Risk analysis is the process of ranking of various risk so that areas of high can be prioritized for treating them.   Risk can be measured and ranked by use of any of the following methods:   Quantitative Risk Assessment Qualitative Risk Assessment Semi-quantitative Risk Assessment   Factor that influence the selection for above technique is availability of accurate data for risk assessment. When data source is accurate and reliable, organization will prefer quantitative risk assessment as it will give risk value in some numeric terms like monitory values. Monetary value is easy to evaluate to determine the risk response. Quantitative Risk Assessment In quantitative risk assessment, risk is measured on the basis on numerical values. This helps in cost benefit analysis as risk in monetary term can be easily compared to cost of various risk responses.   In quantitative risk assessment, various statist...
Read more